Jump to content

MEPs scheduled to vote on #CETA week beginning 12 December

News item

Monday 21 Nov 2016

Talks around the trade deal between the EU and Canada have concluded – this deal is called The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). To come into force the final agreement has to be passed by a majority of MEPs in the European Parliament.

A major cause for concern is the inclusion of a special Investment Court System (ICS) into CETA. This would allow corporations to sue EU member states who wish to introduce strong legislation to protect public health, food safety and environmental legislation for example. There are concerns that this court system will have a chilling effect on the introduction of new legislation.

CETA is enthusiastically supported by the Irish government who believes the deal has the potential to bring benefits to the Irish SME sector. You can read a copy here of An Taoiseach’s letter in this regard. The Irish Government also supports the provisional implementation of CETA before it is ratified by each member state parliament.

I am very wary of allowing the introduction of any court that would supersede national courts, and as things stand I intend to vote against CETA when the deal comes before the European Parliament for the final vote.

Timeline for CETA ratification

  • The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) was adopted by the European Council and signed at the EU-Canada Summit on 30 October 2016.
  • After this official signing, the European Parliament will then be asked to vote on the treaty, currently scheduled for week-beginning 12th December 2016. To pass the treaty requires majority support in parliament.
  • Then if passed by the European Parliament, the treaty will be applied provisionally in advance of each member state voting on the deal in their national parliaments.
  • Each member state will then have to vote to ratify the full treaty – until this point the Investor Court System (ICS) will not be applied.
  • According to the European Commission, a rejection at national level would not cease the provisional application in areas of exclusive EU competence.
  • NOTE – without support of the 28 member state parliaments there would be no Investor Court System, and the treaty would not include all the environmental, labour and fisheries clauses, and there would be no mutual recognition of qualifications for example.


Note:  you may be interested in reading my media statements about TTIP & CETA and lack of transparency around the negotiations:

MEPs support Parliament of Wallonia vote to reject CETA

CETA’s Irish cheerleaders are glossing over serious concerns

EC Chief Juncker sends appalling signal on EU Canada trade deal

Childers calls on government to allow open debate in Ireland re CETA

Tipping the balance for global justice #CETA #TTIP

New investor protection deal in EU Canada trade talks offers little consolation

Exclusive corporate courts wrong way forward for transatlantic trade – Childers

MEP Childers moves to take out private investor courts from EU US trade talks

EU court ruling exposes insider access to EU trade talks by big business

Sugarcoated EU US Investor state dispute mechanism fails to convince

The EU and EU trade deal talks should we be concerned

Big tobaccos legal threats highlight danger of EU US trade-talks

Media and citizens beware EU trade secrets proposal a threat to freedom of speech safety

EU consultation shows huge public scepticism against corporate legal protection in EU US trade-talks

Seminar hosted by Nessa Childers MEP: The EU US trade deal talks: should we be concerned? #ttip

Minister Brutons letter to Commission on EU US trade only in the interests of big business

Childers calls for public debate on the social and public health impact of the proposed transatlantic trade and investment partnership

Nessa with stop CETA sign