Jump to content


Next generation trade deals – We need to ask who benefits and why? #StopTTIP #StopCETA

EU US Trade talks protest

Blog

Wednesday 7 Sep 2016

The EU on behalf of the member states is current negotiating an EU US trade deal called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).  Talks around another trade deal between the EU and Canada have concluded – this deal is called The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). (Blog post updated 7th November)

TTIP & CETA

Although there are lots of reports of its demise TTIP is currently alive and is being negotiated and, like CETA, this deal it if proceeds has the potential to influence government and the EU in ways that go beyond usual trade deals. The negotiations centre on the services markets and regulations as negotiators seek to streamline regulations and liberalise the services sector. Water, healthcare, education , postal services and energy could be open to being privatised under the deal. Many citizens’ groups including SIPTU, IMPACT and The Irish Cancer Society have outlined their concerns.

Like The Trade in Services Agreement  (TISA) – a World Trade Organisation/EU agreement also currently being negotiated, these next generation agreements involve opening up health, education, social care services and allowing private business access to these services in competition with local authorities and governments.

Aside from the lack of coverage in the Irish media of the actual substance of these very critical trade talks, there are a number of concerns being expressed by campaign and civil society groups. In particular that a special Investment Court System (ICS) will be incorporated into CETA & TTIP to allow corporations to sue EU member states who wish to introduce strong legislation to protect public health, food safety and environmental legislation for example. There are concerns that this court system will have a chilling effect on the introduction of new legislation.

TTIP and CETA are enthusiastically supported by the Irish government who believes the deal has the potential to bring benefits to the Irish SME sector. You can read a copy here of An Taoiseach’s letter in this regard. The Irish Government also supports the provisional implementation of CETA before it is ratified by each member state parliament.

To come into force TTIP and CETA have to be passed by a majority of MEPs in the European Parliament, and I too have to carefully consider how I will vote on these critical treaties.

I share the serious concerns about the ability of member states and the European Union to introduce new laws in certain areas if TTIP and CETA come into force. I am also very wary of allowing the introduction of any court that would supersede national courts. Because of these concerns I worked with like-minded MEPs and submitted amendments to the Parliament’s formal report on TTIP tabled in 2015.

As things stand I will not vote for either of these trade deals when they come before the European Parliament for the final vote.

Timeline for CETA ratification

  • The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) was adopted by the European Council and signed at the EU-Canada Summit on 30 October 2016.
  • After this official signing, the European Parliament will then be asked to vote on the treaty, likely in late 2016 or early 2017. To pass the treaty requires majority support in parliament.
  • Then if passed by the European Parliament, the treaty will be applied provisionally in advance of each member state voting on the deal in their national parliaments.
  • Each member state will then have to vote to ratify the full treaty – until this point the Investor Court System (ICS) will not be applied.
  • According to the European Commission, a rejection at national level would not cease the provisional application in areas of exclusive EU competence.
  • NOTE – without support of the 28 member state parliaments there would be no Investor Court System, and the treaty would not include all the environmental, labour and fisheries clauses, and there would be no mutual recognition of qualifications for example.

stop_ceta

Note:  you may be interested in reading my media statements about TTIP & CETA and lack of transparency around the negotiations:

MEPs support Parliament of Wallonia vote to reject CETA

CETA’s Irish cheerleaders are glossing over serious concerns

EC Chief Juncker sends appalling signal on EU Canada trade deal

Childers calls on government to allow open debate in Ireland re CETA

Tipping the balance for global justice #CETA #TTIP

New investor protection deal in EU Canada trade talks offers little consolation

Exclusive corporate courts wrong way forward for transatlantic trade – Childers

MEP Childers moves to take out private investor courts from EU US trade talks

EU court ruling exposes insider access to EU trade talks by big business

Sugarcoated EU US Investor state dispute mechanism fails to convince

The EU and EU trade deal talks should we be concerned

Big tobaccos legal threats highlight danger of EU US trade-talks

Media and citizens beware EU trade secrets proposal a threat to freedom of speech safety

EU consultation shows huge public scepticism against corporate legal protection in EU US trade-talks

Seminar hosted by Nessa Childers MEP: The EU US trade deal talks: should we be concerned? #ttip

Minister Brutons letter to Commission on EU US trade only in the interests of big business

Childers calls for public debate on the social and public health impact of the proposed transatlantic trade and investment partnership

TTIP reading room protest, Oct 2014

TTIP reading room protest, Oct 2014